A robust democracy functions as a public good, providing citizens with the essential tool of bargaining power to assert their rights. In such democracies, individuals frequently discover and defend their rights through negotiation and deliberation. However, disparities in power dynamics can sometimes lead to controversy and dissent. Unfortunately, in modern times, elected governments often prioritize ruling over governance, resulting in the erosion of democratic structures and institutions. Strong institutions are crucial for effective governance, but when they are weakened or co-opted by ruling parties, democracy suffers. In recent years, in India, media outlets, predominantly owned by corporations, have exacerbated this imbalance of power by often aligning with the interests of governments rather than those of the people.
In numerous democratic nations, including India theoretically, the sway wielded by media houses, often delegated by powerful entities, distorts the democratic process. Despite a handful of independent voices, a significant portion of mainstream media either stays silent or indulges in propagandistic politics. The narratives advanced by current governments often echo those of dictators, crafting illusions of representing the majority’s interests. They construct narratives that align their personal agendas with the supposed agenda of the people. These governments not only vie for votes but also insist on subservience, effectively aiming to control and manipulate public opinion.
In the context of democracy as a public good, individuals who assert their rights through negotiation can be seen as cooperators, striving for the collective benefit. However, corporations, leveraging their power and resources, often act as free riders in the democratic process, benefiting without contributing to the common good. Independent media figures and civil servants who challenge these power dynamics can be viewed as altruistic punishers, seeking to uphold democratic principles and hold powerful entities accountable. However, their effectiveness hinges on achieving a critical mass and working in coordination. It’s imperative for citizens to support these individuals financially to ensure they can continue their crucial work and amplify their voices. Failure to do so not only allows powerful governments to advance their agendas unchecked but also undermines the democratic ideals of transparency and accountability.
Regrettably, societal trends are shifting towards individualistic pursuits, such as prioritizing career advancement and financial investments for personal gain, at the expense of collective bargaining for democratic rights and the welfare of society at large. The rising costs of education and healthcare, coupled with luxurious lifestyles, deter individuals from actively participating in civil movements advocating for a free and equitable society. In this era of individualistic pursuits, the collective bargaining power diminishes, paving the way for dictatorial rule under the guise of democracy. It is incumbent upon us, as citizens, to critically assess the trajectory of our democracy and safeguard multiculturalism and individual rights before it’s too late.
